We reported on this a couple of weeks ago: a la carte legal services rather than an entire meal. Attorney and client agree on a specific service, ususally for a specific fee. Problem? The specific service may not be everything necessary. As an example, attorney agrees to help client in divorce mediation, but does not check/change the pleadings, marshall the exhibits.
What happens when the result is sub-optimal and the client wonders where it all went wrong? Here is astory on the movement.