After a multi-million dollar investment suffered some unexpected tax issues, litigation between some legal giants started. Bloostein v Morrison Cohen LLP 2017 NY Slip Op 31238(U) June 7, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651242/2012 Judge: Anil C. Singh involves a state supreme court case and at least one arbitration. The players include
Uncategorized
Win at Trial, Lose on Appeal
Gall v Colon-Sylvain 2017 NY Slip Op 04424 Decided on June 7, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department is the story of a real estate case gone bad, a non-jury trial ending in success for plaintiff and a complete reversal at trial. How can Supreme Court and the Appellate Division differ so, on the same set…
First Chapter in the Big Queens Legal Malpractice Saga
It’s a common enough scenario. Home buyer (not a professional) wants to buy what looks like a bargain. Home buyer goes to an attorney and the closing takes place. Problem? ECB as judgments against the property which don’t get taken care of, the neighbor has a right to use the driveway and there are structural…
“A” Proximate Cause v. Sole Proximate Cause
What, exactly, is the standard by which legal malpractice proximate cause is measured? Remember, legal malpractice is the sole area of the law in which an additional burden is placed upon the plaintiff: the “but for” requirement. New York State Workers’ Compensation Bd. v Program Risk Mgt., Inc. 2017 NY Slip Op 04184 Decided on…
A Huge Tax Deduction Loss and Third-Party Claims
Really, the numbers boggle. Clients collectively lost a $3 Million tax deduction when one of the trustees, without telling anyone else, waived the claim. A professional malpractice claim followed in 1993 Trust of Joan Cohen v Baum 2017 NY Slip Op 30894(U) May 2, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150058/2015 Judge: Shirley…
How Egregious Must The Act Be?
Judiciary Law § 487 is a harsh, almost medieval law, with treble damages and a potential criminal conviction lurking. The Appellate Division has said that it is not lightly granted, and in Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP 2017 NY Slip Op 00535 [146 AD3d 662] January 26, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department…
Does “The Plaintiff’s then husband” Explain This Case?
It seems that when the husband was injured, the defendant law firm sued for both him and the wife (in loss of consortium). Years later it was said that the plaintiff signed a release for her “loss of services” claim. She denies settling her portion of the case. What happened? Were they now divorced and…
Just How Immediate Was That Benefit?
In big financial transactions, big law firm 1 may often interact with big law firm 2 in the generation of loan documents, opinion letters and the such. Their interaction, viz-a-viz the clients (on both sides) may yield significant risk the law firms.
Bloostein v Morrison Cohen LLP 2017 NY Slip Op 30833(U) April 21, 2017 …
How Will this Conviction Thing Shake Out?
Last week we reported a cataclysmic event in Judiciary Law 487. It was Magistrate Scott’s report and recommendation in Bounkhoun v. Barnes, 15-cv-631A. District Judge Richard Arcara is presiding over the case. He wrote: “Where does all of the above analysis leave plaintiff? Plaintiff has pled that defendants ignored her desire to settle…
https://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/2017/04/uncategorized/5672/
We wrote about this case last week. Today the NYLJ writes an article. What is this all about, and is it an earthquake in the Judiciary Law § 487 world? Joel Stashenko writes: “A client dissatisfied with her attorneys’ work in a personal injury case cannot bring a legal misconduct claim under state Judiciary Law…